大学评估
织教育
织教育 is utilized for all Educational Program, 学生支援服务, and Administrative Unit annual 评估, as well as core curriculum and core course 评估.
These annual 评估s are an integral part of SACSCOC compliance, 特别是认可原则的第7条(院校规划及成效)及第8条(学生成绩).
2021-2022 Academic Unit Results Spreadsheet
2021-2022 Administrative Unit Results Spreadsheet
2020-2021 Academic Unit Results Spreadsheet
2020-2021 Administrative Unit Results Spreadsheet
2019-2020 Academic Unit Results Spreadsheet
2019-2020 Administrative Unit Results Spreadsheet
2017-2018年WEAVE计划细则
织教育 Assessment Instructions
在线课程评估
十大电子游艺网站排行 uses SmartEvals, an online course evaluation software, which provides colleges and universities with instructor and course evaluations. A web-based software application, SmartEvals采用尖端技术设计，在调查设置和报告方面为不同部门和课程类型提供了极大的灵活性和定制性.
在线课程评估的目标是改善课程评估的文化, 通过提供可定制的基于互联网的解决方案，将为教师和管理人员提供更好的信息，以做出数据驱动的决策. 研究表明，与学校主办的课程相比，学生们认为第三方课程能提供更大的匿名性保证. 结果是更高的参与度，更多深思熟虑的回应，以及更大的可用数据库.
课程评估时间表:
5-Week Terms - 1 week before the last scheduled class day
8/10-Week Terms - 2 weeks before the last scheduled class day
15-Week Terms - 2 weeks before the last scheduled class day. 不包括期末考试周吗. Evaluations end the day before the first full day of finals
2019-2020 SmartEvals Response Rates
2018-2019 SmartEvals Response Rates
2017-2018 SmartEvals Response Rates
2016-2017 SmartEvals Response Rates
核心课程评估
新的核心课程从2014年秋季开始在德克萨斯州全面实施，所有进入德克萨斯州公立机构的新生都完成了新的核心课程要求.
十大电子游艺网站排行的通识教育核心课程符合德克萨斯州参议院授权和规则的标准, 德克萨斯州高等教育协调委员会的建议和声明(见第4章B§4).28-4.31. The required objectives are stated as:
- 批判性思维 Skills - to include creative thinking, 创新, 调查, 和分析, evaluation and synthesis of information
- Communication Skills - to include effective development, interpretation and expression of ideas through written, 口头和视觉交流
- 经验和定量技能-包括对数字数据或可观察事实的操作和分析，从而得出明智的结论
- 团队合作-包括考虑不同观点的能力，并有效地与他人合作，以支持共同的目的或目标
- Social Responsibility - to include intercultural competence, knowledge of civic responsibility, and the ability to engage effectively in regional, 国家, 以及全球社区
- Personal Responsibility - to include the ability to connect choices, 行为和道德决策的后果(德克萨斯高等教育协调委员会), 2013
Elements of the Texas Core Curriculum Student Learning Outcomes Matrix
Undergraduate Academic Policies and Procedures核心课程评估 Committee
评估资源
What is the difference between objective and outcome?
来自德保罗大学:目标和结果之间的区别在于强调谁将执行这些活动.Learning (or course) objectives generally describe what an instructor, 程序, 或机构的目标, 而, 学习成果以可观察和可测量的术语描述学生在完成学习经历后能够做什么.g.(课程、项目或单位).
课程目标举例:
- 我们将涵盖历史观点和关于大众传播在20世纪的作用的辩论.
- 学生将了解新媒体对身份形成的影响和影响.
学习成果的例子
- As a result of participating in Quantitative Reasoning and Technological Literacy I, students will be able to evaluate statistical claims in the popular press.
- As a result of completing Ethics and Research I, 学生将能够描述特定的伦理冲突对研究结果的潜在影响.
- As a result of completing Money and Banking, 学生将能够确定各种现金管理策略的成本效益和缺点.
Differences Between Course Objectives and Student Learning Outcomes
Revised Blooms Taxonomy Action Words
以下是来自AAC格式的VALUE(本科教育中学习的有效评估)标准&U (American Association of Colleges and Universities).
来自AAC格式&U: VALUE规则是开放教育资源(OER)，使教育者能够评估学生的原创作品. AAC格式&U提供了一种经过验证的方法，用于应用VALUE规则来评估学生在16个领域的可靠和可验证的表现, cross-cutting learning outcomes.
Please use these for 程序atic and core curriculum 评估:
Foundations and Skills for Lifelong Learning
Intercultural Knowledge and Competence
For core curriculum/general education, please see Texas Core Objectives and Associated Value Rubric Chart, to see how the VALUE rubrics align with the Texas Core Objectives.
University Institutional Effectiveness Committee (UIEC)
大学制度效能委员会的职责是发展, 持续改进, 并监督大学的评估程序和做法，在各个层面和大学运作的各个方面, 并向适当的大学机构和人员提出相关建议.
费用: 大学制度效能委员会应向教务长及校长报告预期结果, 评估, and evidence of improvement in all divisions and areas of university operation. 成员由校长任命，包括各学院的教师评估代表, 教务委员会, 教职员评议会, 职员评议会, and office of planning and 评估. In addition, each administrative unit evaluated shall have a representative. The chair is also appointed by the President.
会员 & 报告: Members are appointed from each college, Faculty Senate, Staff Senate, & representative administrative units. Chair is appointed by the President; charge to Committee given by President; recommendations from Committee presented to President.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
通过对学生的调查， 大学生报告, NSSE每年收集数百所四年制学院和大学的学生参与机构为他们的学习和个人发展提供的项目和活动的信息. 调查结果提供了对大学生如何利用时间以及他们从上大学中获得什么的估计.
NSSE为参与机构提供各种报告，将其学生的回答与自我选择的比较机构学生的回答进行比较. 可以对个别调查问题和NSSE有效教育实践的五个基准进行比较. Each November, NSSE also publishes its 年度业绩, which reports topical research and trends in student engagement results. NSSE researchers also present and publish research findings throughout the year.
2019十大电子游艺网站排行NSSE数据
2019 NSSE Engagement Indicators
2019 NSSE High Impact Practices
2018 十大电子游艺网站排行 NSSE Data
2018 NSSE Engagement Indicators
2018 NSSE High Impact Practices
2017 十大电子游艺网站排行 NSSE Data
2017 NSSE High Impact Practices
2016 十大电子游艺网站排行 NSSE Data
2016 NSSE Engagement Indicators
2013 十大电子游艺网站排行 NSSE Data
2013 NSSE High Impact Practices
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE)
教师学生参与调查(FSSE)旨在补充全国学生参与调查(NSSE)。, which is administered to undergraduate students. This instructional staff version (for faculty, 教练, and graduate students who teach) focuses on:
- 教学人员对学生参加不同活动的频率的看法.
- 教学人员重视各个领域的学习和发展.
- The nature and frequency of instructional staff-student interactions.
- How instructional staff organize their time, both in and out of the classroom.
该项目由印第安纳大学高等教育研究中心协调. FSSE旨在衡量教学人员对学生参与教育实践的期望，这些实践与高水平的学习和发展有经验联系.
自2003年以来, 超过250人,000 instructional staff from more than 800 institutions have responded to FSSE.
2019 十大电子游艺网站排行 FSSE Data
2018 十大电子游艺网站排行 FSSE Data
2017 十大电子游艺网站排行 FSSE Data
2016 十大电子游艺网站排行 FSSE Data
2013 十大电子游艺网站排行 FSSE Data
